Skip to content

databricks_langchain 0.4.2 release #98

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

sunishsheth2009
Copy link
Contributor

Improve validation for index_name for vectorIndex

harupy and others added 3 commits April 8, 2025 17:35
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[project]
name = "databricks-langchain"
version = "0.4.1.dev0"
version = "0.4.2"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't want to commit removing the dev0 here right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@sunishsheth2009 sunishsheth2009 Apr 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is against the databricks-ai-bridge-0.4.1 branch. In master yes we want to keep the .dev0 but in the branch we want to remove it.

Let me know if I am missing something

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah okay, looks good 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@annzhang-db annzhang-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 😄

@sunishsheth2009 sunishsheth2009 merged commit 806ba8a into databricks-ai-bridge-0.4.1 Apr 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@sunishsheth2009 sunishsheth2009 deleted the sunishsheth2009/databricks-ai-bridge-0.4.1 branch April 9, 2025 00:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants